Blue Ribbon Commission On Sustainability & The MTA
Just a short while ago the MTA’s Blue Ribbon Commission wrapped up its press conference which it unveiled its final report on environmental sustainability. The press conference which was held in Washington D.C. featured many different participants including Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Elliot G. Sander, Executive Director and CEO of the MTA, Jonathan Rose, Chairman, Commission on Sustainability and the MTA.
The MTA just issued a press release highlighting the final report. Here is the full press release:
Washington, D.C., January 8, 2009 — The Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Sustainability and the MTA today released a synopsis of its final report on strategies that the transit agency and government officials can use to reduce the MTA region’s environmental impact.
The report, which provides a model for urban and suburban regions across the nation, quantifies the environmental benefits of mass transit, and includes nearly 100 recommendations for strategies and technologies to reduce the MTA region’s carbon footprint while generating long-term savings and economic growth. The report was presented by Jonathan F.P. Rose, Chairman of the Sustainability Commission, to MTA Executive Director and CEO Elliot G. Sander.
Among its many transformational recommendations, the report calls for the MTA to draw 80 percent of its operating energy from clean, renewable energy sources by 2050, and suggests ways this should be done. At the same time, it urges a significant expansion of transit access in order for the MTA transit system to reach and absorb two thirds of the New York metropolitan area’s projected growth of 4 million people between now and 2030.
By ensuring that an increased share of this growth develops as transit-oriented clusters rather than sprawl, the MTA’s expansion will have a significant impact not only on regional productivity, but on our national energy and climate-stabilization goals. The report points to strategies that will reduce regional CO2 emissions while expanding the mobility needed to remain competitive in a global financial, educational, and cultural marketplace.
Initial assessment of the report’s recommendations indicates a possible yield of 105,500 net new jobs per year, employment income of $5.1 billion a year, and regional economic output of fully $17 billion per year for the period from 2010 to 2019. This urgent stimulus priority at the federal level intersects with the equally urgent international commitment to contain global warming, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy.
By removing some 3 million drivers from the roads each day, the MTA already avoids more carbon emissions than 648,000 acres of forest absorb. This “carbon avoidance” benefit is increasingly viewed as a measurable commodity with societal benefits and a market value. In effect, the MTA provides unreimbursed carbon reduction services for which many industries now claim financial and funding credits.
Governor David A. Paterson said: “I commend the MTA and the Commission for addressing these critically important and challenging issues. These recommendations are in line with my commitment to environmental sustainability, including my work convening and leading the Renewable Energy Task Force.
In the State of the State Address yesterday, I called for New York to meet 45 percent of its energy needs from improved energy efficiency and clean renewable energy by 2015. These recommendations will play an important part in that effort.”
U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler, a senior Member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said: “Sustainability and environmental sensitivity in our transit systems are now more essential than ever. The MTA’s Blue Ribbon Commission is not simply charged with exploring cost-cutting measures for the agency but is an important new model for bringing mass transit into the 21st century.
The current economic crisis – combined with our expanding population, urban pollution and an aging infrastructure – demands that we invest in cleaner, more energy efficient transit. We must also create a new green workforce to get Americans back to work. I commend the MTA, Lee Sander, Jonathan Rose and the Blue Ribbon Commission for their initiative in modernizing New York’s transit systems.”
U.S. Representative John Hall, a member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, said: “Investments in green infrastructure create three to five times as many jobs as investments in traditional infrastructure or sources of energy.
I applaud the MTA for committing itself not only to upgrading and improving its service and access but also to reducing CO2 emissions and its environmental footprint. This will not only hire more people but keep everyone in the metropolitan area healthier.”
Elliot G Sander, MTA Executive Director and CEO, said: “Everything the MTA does – providing 8½ million rides each day, increasing ridership by nearly 50% since 1996, achieving record breaking on-time performance and mechanical reliability, pulling off innovations like MetroCard, EZ Pass, and hybrid electric and clean diesel buses, and passing the test virtually every rush hour – contributes to environmental sustainability.
As the Federal government considers economic stimulus legislation and the upcoming T4 transportation reauthorization, it needs to recognize the enormous benefits that transit provides in terms of environmental sustainability and economic growth.”
Jonathan F.P. Rose, Chairman of the MTA Sustainability Commission, said: “If we as a nation are to begin working seriously to prevent global warming, we need to radically rethink the way we fund mass transit. Our national discussion about public transit needs to acknowledge, and put a value on, the enormous carbon avoidance that transit creates while providing mobility to keep our economy competitive. Funding levels for transit need to be commensurate with an enterprise that accomplishes both of these critical goals.”
Robert D. Yaro, President of the Regional Plan Association, said: “Should we fail to act now, there is little doubt that much of the projected economic growth will be diverted to those global cities capable of sustaining it, placing New York’s position of global economic leadership at serious risk and undermining the economic potential for future generations.”
David Lewis, Senior Vice President and National Director, Economics and Financial Services for HDR, Inc., said: “The current financial crisis gives these recommendations an even more immediate economic relevance. The crisis is widely viewed as a unique opportunity to frame stimulus actions in a way that will redirect public investment over the long term.
Such redirection focuses on three long-standing concerns: climate change; energy security; and infrastructure renewal and expansion. All three of these priorities argue for expanded investment in transit. In other words, a transit system such as the MTA stands dead center at the stimulus sweet spot.”
William W. Millar, President of the American Public Transportation Association, said: “As the largest public transportation system in North America and one of the biggest in the world, MTA’s actions will serve as a model for how we as a nation can reduce our carbon footprint and achieve energy independence. We call on the federal government and Congress to increase investment for public transit, so that America can create more jobs, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and become more carbon efficient.”
Geoff Anderson, Co-Chair of Transportation for America said: “Now is the time to invest in transportation infrastructure for the 21st century that can create a true ‘green’ recovery from the ongoing economic crisis. The MTA report underscores the untapped potential to create and support millions of jobs, and cut our dependence on oil through smart, targeted investments in clean, green infrastructure.”
Deron Lovaas, Federal Transportation Policy Director for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said: “This report underscores that investment in public transportation is win-win-win: It provides a stimulative shot-in-the-arm for an ailing economy and is indispensable as a tool for achieving energy security and tackling climate change.”
As the largest regional mass transit system in the country and with a third of all U.S. transit ridership, this new investment and operating philosophy by the MTA can serve as a forward-looking model for other organizations and metropolitan regions in adapting to a changing economy. It is crucial to keep pace with the other major global transit systems that are now rapidly modernizing, expanding and adjusting to rising energy costs and the pricing of CO2 emissions.
Now here is the complete report broken up into sections. If you would like to view them individually, click the individual titles which will enable you to download the documents to your computer. I will start with the:
Why Greening Transit Makes Economic Sense: Transit’s Four Key Economic Impacts:
Avoiding Carbon Emissions: A regional “mode shift” from automobiles to transit yields economic and environmental benefits at many levels. For example, the CO2 emissions from transit ridership are about one-fifth of those produced by single occupancy automobiles, as measured on a per-passenger-mile basis. Thus, in addition to overall fuel efficiency, the shift from automobiles to transit means an 80 percent rate of “carbon avoidance.”
Since transportation accounts for nearly 40 percent of GHG emissions in the U.S., the greening of the nation’s largest transit system has significant value, both directly and as an infrastructure model for other urban areas. As it continues to quantify its carbon avoidance rates, the MTA will also be well positioned for emerging carbon trade markets and carbon-based funding criteria.
Managing Regional Congestion: Transit reduces traffic congestion, which cost the regional economy some $13 billion in 2007 alone, according to the Partnership for New York City. By improving traffic flow, transit optimizes regional mobility for both passenger and freight sectors. This in turn reduces fuel costs, vehicle operating costs, and the costs associated with traffic accidents.
By easing congestion, transit also reduces CO2 emissions from the remaining auto traffic, resulting in yet another level of “carbon avoidance.” Moreover, studies show that in periods of rapid land development and population growth, transit rail systems in highway corridors will absorb and stabilize any related rise in traffic congestion.
Optimizing Land Use: Transit enables more clustered residential and commercial development, which brings dramatic economic and sustainability gains. According to a major study by the National Research Council, more compact settlement patterns could save the nation $540 billion in building and infrastructure costs.
Moreover, compact, transit-based development not only reduces automobile travel, it reduces the average miles between destinations for all modes of travel, including automobiles. Thus the land-use patterns generated by transit produce a “virtuous spiral” with an ongoing decline in energy consumption and corresponding rise in carbon avoidance. This is clearly evident in the high-density, transit-rich MTA region, where per capita energy consumption is now one quarter the national average.
Generating Higher Values: The value of transit to regional economies will be felt through higher worker mobility, lower energy costs, reduced pressure on public services and other effects. Significantly, those benefits will also extend beyond direct transit system users to the economy at large. One example is the impact on property values, as demonstrated in numerous studies.
A study for the Federal Transit Administration, for example, indicates an increase in residential equity value of about $160 for every 100 additional feet of transit station proximity. Another study in Washington, D.C. shows that for each 1,000 foot decrease in the distance to a transit rail station, commercial property values increased by $2.30 per square foot, while the total value for properties averaging 30,500 square feet rose by over $70,000.
Top Recommendations for Greening the MTA and the MTA Region:
The Blue Ribbon Commission on Sustainability and the MTA, appointed in September 2007 by MTA Executive Director and CEO Elliot G. Sander, was charged with developing sustainability-related recommendations for the MTA and its operating agencies.
To develop a strategy, the Commission’s 22 members divided into working groups covering key areas of sustainability planning: Energy/Carbon; Smart-growth/Transit-Oriented Development; Water Management; Materials Flow; Facilities; and Climate Adaptation. In addition to the commissioners, each group worked with designated MTA staff, research consultants, and pro bono experts to arrive at the following recommendations.
The Commission believes these recommendations are applicable to transit agencies across the country, and the regions they serve.
Energy/Carbon:
• The MTA should draw 80 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2050. To achieve this, the MTA should join a consortium of public entities to pursue offshore wind farms capable of generating up to 1,500 megawatts of clean energy.
• The MTA should identify carbon avoidance as a revenue source to underscore the MTA’s role as a provider of climate stabilization services in its region and to establish the value of MTA services under any decarbonization policy (carbon tax, cap-and-trade, post-Kyoto/Copenhagen rules, etc.).
• The MTA should reduce operational energy use and GHG emissions by 25 percent by 2019 (on a per-passenger-mile basis) through energy retrofits, smart fleet technologies and more.
• The MTA should establish a “green” MetroCard contribution program, through which customers could make voluntary, tax-deductible donations to fund green aspects of sustainable capital and operating projects at the MTA.
• The MTA should field test and implement weight reduction and regenerative braking technologies, as recommended by the Commission’s Smart Fleets task force.
Smart Growth/Transit-Oriented Development (TOD):
• The MTA should capture two-thirds of all new vehicle miles traveled (VMT) generated within its region through 2030. To achieve this, the MTA should advise communities and collaborate with them on how to create and expand feeder and distributor lines and eliminate gaps in the regional transit network.
• The MTA should promote clustered development throughout its region, seeking to draw two-thirds of all new development to within a quarter-mile to a half-mile of transit access within the MTA network.
• The MTA should take the lead in closing the “last mile” transportation gap by improving access to transit through robust, flexible feeder and distributor services, as well as pedestrian and bike improvements.
• The MTA should develop a system-wide TOD program that articulates principles and guidelines for TOD project development and should assist communities, developers and stakeholders throughout the region in planning these community-based initiatives.
Water Management:
• The MTA should identify beneficial uses for the millions of gallons of groundwater pumped out of subway system tunnels.
• The MTA should reduce its use of potable water by 25 percent or more by 2020 by substituting rainwater, recycling greywater, and/or other conservation practices.
• The MTA should install system-wide metering and sub-metering to reduce its water consumption.
• The MTA should improve water fixtures and conservation at MTA facilities through water-efficient designs, water-saving fixtures, and employee programs.
• The MTA should improve the efficiency of its vehicle washes system-wide.
Materials Flow:
• The MTA should institute a green Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) system to manage its procurements and waste flow, including purchasing guidelines for green products and services.
• The MTA should expand its recycling programs, with added waste recovery, pilot programs for site-separation bins at stations and more.
• The MTA should enhance its efforts to find practical uses and market opportunities for its waste flow.
• The MTA should use its flex market power to spur the creation of green goods and services in the mid-Atlantic region.
• The MTA should encourage the use of low-carbon, local materials at all agencies, and by local vendors.
• The MTA should expand the procurement of sustainable railroad ties at all rail agencies.
Facilities :
• The MTA should adopt Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED™) Silver as its standard for all building projects, new construction, and major renovations wherever applicable and either re-commission existing buildings or pursue LEED-Existing Buildings: Operations and Maintenance (LEED-EB) where possible.
• For all other transit facilities not covered by LEED standards, the MTA should develop MTA Green Design Guidelines, based on the LEED system.
• The MTA should develop a green Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) system for facilities to track the upfront costs and long-term savings from high- performance and regenerative design features.
• The MTA should increase the number of LEED accredited employees.
• The MTA should seek LEED-EB Rating for Grand Central Terminal.
Climate Adaptation:
• The MTA should develop a climate-adaptation decision matrix to identify options for protecting transit infrastructure from storm surge, extreme heat, and other manifestations of climate change.
• The MTA should implement a Climate Adaptation Resiliency Evaluation Procedure (CARE Trigger Elevation), which would be triggered when any new projects or major alterations are undertaken where critical structural components are located in present or potential coastal surge flood zones.
Federal Legislative and Policy Recommendations:
The Blue Ribbon Commission on Sustainability and the MTA, appointed in September 2007 by MTA Executive Director and CEO Elliot G. Sander, was charged with developing sustainability-related recommendations for the MTA and its operating agencies.
The Commission supports providing the MTA with $75 billion to $100 billion over the course of the next two MTA capital plans (2010-2014 and 2015-2019) to prepare the MTA and its service region for a sustainable future. Investments at these higher levels will help the MTA region and the nation weather the current recession as well as accelerate the region’s transition from fossil-fuel dependency to a low-carbon economy.
Today’s report contains nearly 100 recommendations in all, with about 20 that are transformational, 40 near-term, and about 30 that require legislative and/or policy action by decision makers at the federal, state and local levels. This activity will not only strengthen and green the MTA system, it will have a positive, lasting impact on sustainability and economic recovery – regionally, nationally, and globally. The federal actions should include:
1. Pass a $1 Trillion Green Stimulus Bill:
• Focusing on 21st century transit and renewable energy
2. Authorize and Reform 2010-15 Transportation Bill at $1 Trillion:
• Emphasize state of good repair
• Reform funds distribution process and prioritize funding for metropolitan areas
• Develop performance measures that recognize existing densities/transit use
• Incentivize regional, intermodal, and pricing projects
• Streamline federal processes/procedures
• Require minimum green standards for receipt of federal funds
3. Require Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reductions:
Link land use and infrastructure investment to reduce GHG emissions by adapting California’s SB 375 to work on a national scale through regional reduction targets and plans
4. Provide Leadership/Funding for Climate Adaptation:
Establish a lead federal agency to coordinate federal, state, and local efforts and funding for climate-adaptation plans, programs, and strategies
5. Raise Federal Gas Tax 40 Cents Over 5 Years and Fund Shift to Mileage-Based User Fees
6. Establish Carbon Emissions Avoidance Market and Dedicate 25 Percent of Revenues to Transit
7. Increase Monthly Commuter Tax Benefit to $220/Month for Transit Commuters
8. Provide Incentives to Lenders that Offer Location Efficient Mortgages (LEMS)
9. Provide Incentives to Developers Who Design and Construct to LEED-Neighborhood Development Standards and Achieve Gold Rating
I wanted to listen in on the press conference but was tied up with some business matters. I do plan on reviewing the conference if they happen to post it. If this does not happen, I will read over the report when I have some free time to do so. However I wanted to bring it to all of you as I felt it was worth reading.
xoxo Transit Blogger
You might enjoy reading these related entries:- MTA Reduces Gas Emissions
- MTA Carbon Emissions Verified
- MTA Receives $2 Million Federal Grant
- Metro-North Looks To Revitalize Harrison
- The MTA Hopes Its Green Attitude Leads To Tons Of Greenbacks
As Expected, The 2 Produces More Of The Same
241st/Wakefield bound 2 train entering Simpson St. Resized photo courtesy of Eye On Transit
Since the debut of the Rider Report Cards, it has been painfully obvious that the more things change, the more they stay the same. For the second year in a row, a subway line finished with the same overall grade from its inaugural results. This time the 
is the line that did not see a change as it once again finished with an overall grade of C. Lets go straight to the breakdown starting with:
2 Train Riders’ Top 10 Priorities; 2007 priority rank will be in ( ):
01. Adequate room on board at rush hour ( 3 )
02. Reasonable wait times for trains ( 1 )
03. Minimal delays during trips ( 2 )
04. Station announcements that are easy to hear ( 4 )
05. Cleanliness of stations ( 6 )
06. Sense of security on trains ( 7 )
07. Train announcements that are easy to hear ( 5 )
08. Sense of security in stations ( 8 )
09. Cleanliness of subway cars ( 9 )
10. Comfortable temperature in subway cars ( 10 )
—-
Now here is the entire order of 5 train riders’ priorities 2007 priority rank will be in ( ):
01. Adequate room on board at rush hour ( 3 )02. Reasonable wait times for trains ( 1 )
03. Minimal delays during trips ( 2 )
04. Station announcements that are easy to hear ( 4 )
05. Cleanliness of stations ( 6 )
06. Sense of security on trains ( 7 )
07. Train announcements that are easy to hear ( 5 )
08. Sense of security in stations ( 8 )
09. Cleanliness of subway cars ( 9 )
10. Comfortable temperature in subway cars ( 10 )
11. Station announcements that are informative ( 11 )
12. Working elevators and escalators in stations ( 12 )
13. Courtesy and helpfulness of station personnel ( 13 )
14. Train announcements that are informative ( 14 )
15. Signs in stations that help riders find their way ( 19 )
16. Availability of MetroCard Vending Machines ( 16 )
17. Ease of use of subway turnstiles ( 18 )
18. Lack of scratchitti in subway cars ( 15 )
19. Signs in subway cars that help riders find their way ( 17 )
20. Lack of graffiti in stations ( 21 )
21. Lack of graffiti in subway cars ( 20 )
—-
Now here is the graded breakdown for all 21 categories; 2007 grade in ( ):
01. Minimal delays during trips C- (C)02. Reasonable wait times for trains C- (C)
03. Adequate room on board at rush hour D (D+)
04. Sense of security in stations C (C)
05. Sense of security on trains C (C)
06. Working elevators and escalators in stations C- (C-)
07. Signs in stations that help riders find their way C+ (C+)
08. Signs in subway cars that help riders find their way C+ (C+)
09. Cleanliness of stations C- (C-)
10. Cleanliness of subway cars C (C)
11. Station announcements that are easy to hear D+ (D+)
12. Station announcements that are informative D+ (D+)
13. Train announcements that are easy to hear C- (C-)
14. Train announcements that are informative C- (C-)
15. Lack of graffiti in stations C+ (C+)
16. Lack of graffiti in subway cars B- (B)
17. Lack of scratchitti in subway cars C+ (C+)
18. Courtesy and helpfulness of station personnel C (C)
19. Comfortable temperature in subway cars C (C+)
20. Ease of use of subway turnstiles B- (B)
21. Availability of MetroCard Vending Machines B- (B-)
Quite frankly I can’t say much about this report card as it is almost identical to the results of 2007. You can check out my feelings on that report by clicking here. However I will throw in a few comments.
I will start with a lower result turnout which has been the status quo with all the results released so far in the 2nd year of the Rider Report Cards. This time the MTA received 3,430 responses compared to 4,028 for the initial report card. Even though the results are pretty much identical, I do find it disheartening that the top 3 priorities remain the same albeit in a different order.
I also feel it is disappointing that 2 of the 3 top priorities received a lower grade from 2007’s results. Overall no priorities from the 2007’s initial results dropped out of the top 10. This is never a good sign for a line that is one of the system’s major players.
The MTA needs to seriously look at how they can better the performance of all their lines. However with a possible “doomsday budget” being implemented in the near future, improvements will not be coming as fast as riders would want.
You might enjoy reading these related entries:- So That’s Where You Have Been Hiding
- The 5 Produces More Of The Same
- The Result Is Still Not Close To Its Name
- The N Shows A Slight Improvement
- (Q)uincy Will Still Hope To “C” Better Days
MTA Delighted With Gov. Patterson
In the previous entry, I wrote about Gov. Patterson clearly understanding the need for the state to invest in its infrastructure, especially mass transit. During his first State of the State address, he made it clear that the state needs to invest in mass transit including the completion of such major projects as East Side Access, & the Second Avenue Subway. Transit advocates, bloggers, etc… were not the only ones pleased with Gov. Patterson’s message. The MTA was delighted to hear the governor express the need to invest in mass transit & a properly funded MTA. Bobby Cuza of NY1 has more in this report:
It was music to the MTA’s ears Wednesday as Governor Paterson outlined his recommendations for the city’s transit system in his first State of the State address.
“We’re going to have to negotiate and eventually pass the recommendations of the Ravitch Commission, which addresses one of our central infrastructures, the MTA,” said Paterson.
Those recommendations, put forward last month by a commission headed by former MTA Chairman Richard Ravitch, could resolve much of the MTA’s financial crisis and avert a huge fare increase being planned for this summer. MTA officials said the fact Paterson singled out the plan in his speech was an encouraging sign.
“I was delighted. The governor’s been great, in terms of supporting the mta and called for the ravitch commission, and just was thrilled that he mentioned it in the state of the state,” said MTA Executive Director & CEO Lee Sander.
Click here for the complete report.
While it is good to hear that the MTA was delighted with yesterday’s message, lets just hope our state legislatures get the wake up call to get us moving in the right direction. March 25th is not that far away so time is of the essence. We know that, do they & most importantly do they really care? We all shall see soon enough.
xoxo Transit Blogger
You might enjoy reading these related entries:- Gov. Patterson Clearly Gets It
- MTA Issues Statement On Ravitch Commission Report
- Our Doomsday Might Come March 25th
- Governor Patterson Appoints 12 Members To MTA Financing Commission
- MTA Approves 2009 Doomsday Budget
Gov. Patterson Clearly Gets It
For many years, the mass transit riders of New York were led by a governor who did not understand or care to for that matter the need for proper funding of our transit infrastructure. This seemed to change when Elliot Spitzer took over but we all know how that ended. Thankfully his replacement, David Patterson clearly understands this & made it very clear during his first State of the State address yesterday.
The governor touched on many topics but for this entry I will focus on his feeling that it is vital that the state invests in its transit infrastructure. Here are his thoughts from yesterday’s address courtesy of the official site for the Governor of New York:
To build a brighter future, we need a smarter, better infrastructure. By making careful and prioritized infrastructure investments, we will create 21st century jobs by building a 21st century infrastructure that will allow our private sector to make its own 21st century investments. Our infrastructure efforts should be targeted so that businesses can invest with confidence – this is where we can create the foundation for economic progress for decades to come.
By investing in roads and bridges, in higher education institutions, in statewide broadband installation and the computerization of medical records, and in clean water and wastewater systems among other projects, we are providing the framework for future economic vitality.
We should complete signature projects all across our State including the Peace Bridge, the Tappan Zee Bridge, the Second Avenue Subway, and the East Side Access. And we should implement the Ravitch Commission recommendations to improve an essential piece of our infrastructure, the MTA.
Here is a brief sample of the governor’s talking points for economic development & revitalization:
o The Metropolitan Transit Authority has projected that its 2009 budget gap will be at least $1.2 billion. Governor Paterson will implement the recommendations of the Ravitch Commission to keep the MTA strong.
o Governor Paterson will continue to move forward on major infrastructure projects across New York, including the Second Avenue Subway, the East Side Access, the Tappan Zee Bridge and the Peace Bridge.
o He will also consider the recommendations of the Commission on State Asset Maximization. Governor Paterson is a strong proponent of partnering with the private sector to maximize public assets. The private sector can contribute expertise and much needed capital for existing asset classes, including transportation, higher education, K-12 education, energy, and surplus properties.
I must say it is refreshing to see a governor in power who understands the needs for strong investments into its state infrastructure especially mass transit. I am also glad that he once again put the onus on the state legislature to get something done. While I have been open about how I feel the Ravitch Commission proposals were an overall dud, they clearly are better than seeing the implementation of the “doomsday budget“.
Regardless of where one stands on the Ravitch Commission proposals, it is clear that something has to be done before the much talked about doomsday scenario becomes our daily nightmare. Will we be saved from doomsday? Stay tuned as we all go on the journey to find out!
xoxo Transit Blogger
You might enjoy reading these related entries:- MTA Delighted With Gov. Patterson
- MTA Issues Statement On Ravitch Commission Report
- Our Doomsday Might Come March 25th
- MTA Approves 2009 Doomsday Budget
- Sneak Peek At The Ravitch Commission Proposals
LIRR Achieves Record On-Time Performance Yet Again
Yesterday I briefly touched on the Long Island Rail Road’s chaotic 2008 which was filled with many highs & lows. The positive news has already started for them as they achieved record on-time performance for the 2nd straight year. The agency issued a press release via e-mail earlier today:
While serving a record number of passengers, the MTA Long Island Rail Road achieved a best-ever On-Time Performance (OTP) of 95.14% in 2008, breaking the previous record of 94.07% set in 2007 by more than a full percentage point.
The 95.14% OTP is the best since modern record keeping began in 1979. The LIRR reached the 95.14% milestone in 2008 while operating 245,933 trains – which is 1,368 more trains than last year.
“This is the second year in a row the LIRR has improved our on-time reliability, while seeing increases in ridership,” said LIRR President Helena Williams. “Our entire workforce – 6,800 strong – deserves credit for reaching this goal. A great railroad is like a great orchestra. All the players, all the sections have to perform at their peak to produce great music. We know that being on time is music to our customers’ ears and I am thankful for the dedication shown by all of our employees.”
Further analysis shows the LIRR also achieved a record 95.43% OTP during the AM Peak period in 2008 (previous record of 94.28% was set in 2007), with 51 of the morning rush hours achieving 100% On Time Performance. The annual Off-Peak performance also set a record 95.32% (previous record 94.64% in 2007). The PM Peak OTP was 93.87% with 28 afternoon rush hours operating at 100%.
A train is considered on time if it reaches its final destination within 5 minutes and 59 seconds of its scheduled arrival time. The standard measure, used throughout the commuter rail industry, was adopted by the LIRR in 1979. That year the LIRR posted an OTP of 83.42% and began an upward climb of improved performance through the decades.
Senior Vice President of Operations Raymond Kenny noted that continued improvements in the work performed by the employees of the Mechanical Department have resulted in fewer breakdowns and new records being set in equipment availability, which directly impacts On Time Performance.
“To meet the schedule and improve performance, you have to have the trains available each day,” Kenny said. “This has helped us achieve the record On Time Performance we experienced in 2008.”
Executive Vice President Albert Cosenza also credited the LIRR’s track and signal crews. ”They make sure that critical communication equipment and the Railroad infrastructure – the running rails – are in good repair,” Cosenza said. “The work they do occurs behind the scenes. Most customers are unaware of their contributions, but their efforts are critical to producing the record On Time Performance we set in 2008.”
Lets hope the LIRR sets another record in 2009!
xoxo Transit Blogger
You might enjoy reading these related entries:
